Lots of interesting data is generated around team performance.Those work units are included in a “Sprint” usually lasting 2 weeks.Work units are scored by the team based on difficulty or expected time consumption.I won’t go into great detail on how Scrum works here, but the main points are as follows: I’ve personally found it to be a great method of answering the old questions of “How long will this take?”, and “How much can we get done?”.
#Mozilla bugzilla software#
Enter Scrumīeing software developers, many of us know and like Scrum. Apart from being a very powerful and configurable tool, this level of participation is a large part of what keeps projects using and wanting to use Bugzilla. If you’ve ever worked for, or contributed to Mozilla, you have a Bugzilla account. The one component that almost every project uses is Bugzilla for issue and feature tracking.
#Mozilla bugzilla free#
We’re free to design our own workflows, use whatever tools we want, and just generally work in whatever way is best for us. Chromium implemented this feature in 2012, like, just 4 years after their first version, by adding a "All your languages" option in the spellchecking menu.Not all teams at Mozilla follow the same software development methodology. Again, not trying to vent here, but this is a 21 years old issue that was just ignored by Firefox developers. The good thing is that there is no words being send to the cloud, and it all happens locally But I found the experience to be a pretty bug-ish one and being nowhere near as the native solution that other browsers implement or even to the previous extension I mentioned.Īnyway, I was wondering how hard would be a for a user to solve this by himself? Is there any other solution I'm not seeing? It doesn't seem that this should be so hard to solve, especially when other browsers already did it. But, it can't detect fields with multiple languages and it's somewhat buggy, like, sometimes you are writing in a given language and the extension, for some reason, simply doesn't set the spellchecker to that language. Third, and probably the best alternative, is the extension "Automatic Spelling Language", it tries to find what languages you are typing on. Anyway, if you don't care about that, it might be a solution for you. The catch here is that all the spellchecker processing happens in the cloud, so you are basically sending every keyword you press to some server out there, which might put a sour taste on some people's mouths. Second, there is a extension called "Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool", which entirely replaces Firefox native spellchecker and actually does a good job detecting misspellings in multiple languages and so on, as well as implementing some other fancy detections of other grammar mistakes. If you simply merged both dictionaries your spellchecker wouldn't be able to correctly point out when you made a mistake, cause it would think you writing in one the languages were that word isn't a misspelling.
Like in Portuguese if you write "video", the spelling is wrong, you have to write "v í deo", while English is the other way around, there is no accentuation. Now, it's pretty obvious why this is a bad approach: there are languages that share many similar words that are more or less the same with the only difference being the accentuation. So in my case I would merge English and Portuguese dictionaries into a single one. In both cases the spellchecker would show you that something is wrong with your text, whether you set your spellchecker to English or Portuguese.Ĭurrently there are some workarounds for this issue, but none of them are that good.įirst, you could merge the dictionaries of all the languages you usually write in. Also, sometimes a given text has two or more languages inside it, like you past some English quote in a middle of a text written in Portuguese. And sadly, Firefox spellchecker isn't able to automatically detect the text of what language I'm typing in. So, I, as many internet users, usually write in more than one language. Firefox spellchecker/Chromium spellchecking
0 kommentar(er)
